Let there be no illusion: England is Islamizing at a rapid pace. And while Birmingham, Bradford or Leicester boasts between 29-33% Muslim population, London, with about 15% Muslim population, could well emerge as the poster child of this phenomenon – given its financial status among the rest of the world.
For a long time, I had held the opinion that successive governments across the aisle either failed to understand the implications or were being forced (by the globalist elites) to take England through this kind of demographic metamorphosis. It was in 2022 sometime after the Leicester Riots it cleared out to me that, maybe it was neither failure nor force, maybe it was plain preference towards a category as the ‘chosen one’ in England’s onward journey towards the future.
The Rotherham and Rochdale Grooming Gangs scandal of Pakistani origin males raping white women in England, especially children, has been covered up assiduously. Parents of the raped children have been silenced – oftentimes by the threat of state-sponsored violence. Prominent voices of the white English people – like Tommy Robinson, have been jailed or detained, or silenced. White conservative political leaders like Nigel Farage are slowly changing their stance too. Top governmental positions are being taken over by or handed over to Muslims of non-UK origins. Hi-profile networking groups like BMN (British Muslim Network) are being promoted, along with subtle push towards introducing sharia laws; ‘Britain has emerged as the “western capital” for sharia courts, with 85 Islamic councils now operating across the country since the first was established in 1982’, notes GBNews. And the conventional UK media which includes BBC or the leftist-drag Guardian – the self-appointed gatekeeper for societal oversight – are covering up meticulously all that which signal to the end of cycle for the white English population. One could go on; but I guess readers get the drift already.
To provide a bit of historical perspective: Afghanistan used to be Buddhist once upon a time. Not anymore. Pakistan split from India in ‘47 explicitly to be a Muslim state; now it is more than 97% Muslim, and minorities like Christians or Ahmadis get crushed. Coptic Christians were a majority once in Egypt; now they are less than 10% and shrinking. Syria and Lebanon once had rich Orthodox Christian communities and culture, but the Beirut of today is anything but “Paris of the Middle East”, and HTS in Syria is killing Alawites and Christians almost at will, with the entire world watching. Also remember Bangladesh – with its Islamic mob running rampage since August of 2024 under the “guidance” of Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus, rape-murdering Hindus and Buddhists to this day – a gory picture that is up for anyone to check.
The pattern is that once the Muslim population in a region hit a chunk ― 20-25% or more ― the shift is quite fast. Mosques multiply, laws start being forcibly bent toward sharia, family issues to begin with, and afterwards reaches to a level where non-Muslims are either forced to convert or leave. They also get killed by Muslim gangs at regular intervals which catalyses their decision making. Pew says Muslim populations grow quicker than most (higher fertility, younger median age), like 2.8 kids per woman from Muslim communities vs. 1.8 among white English people. Once a society reaches that level – like Birmingham or Rotherham, the exoticism of prayer-calls and halal shops disappear, the only thing that dominates is the forcible culture tilt. Straight up? When England hits that threshold, it’s not hard to see an “Islamised” future. Ignoring that trend would be betting against the playbook.
Which brings us to an important question: When England flips ― say, by 2040, when it becomes a majority-Muslim country, or at least has a government that is dominated by Islamic considerations – what could be the geopolitical implications?
Gaming this scenario out points towards a seismic shift for Western Europe. Let us try to understand why. An Islamised England would then not just be some remote and accidental island, but a nuclear armed heavyweight in the Muslim world, sitting on a UN Security Council seat with a fair access to a chunk of global finance, thanks to its proximity to the City of London. With an Islamic government, the call to recreate its military strength would find millions of takers among a rapidly proliferating Muslim population. This would present an opportunity that Turkey – if it is still under Erdogan or one of his protégé – might want to capitalize on. And in some manner, this would complete the unfinished business that Elizabeth I initiated, when she sought an alliance with Sultan Murad, equated Protestantism with Islam, as she continuously appealed to the Sultan calling for demolishing Catholicism in Europe by joining hands militarily with her. Only that this time, Turkey – which is one of the largest military powers of NATO – could be more interested than Sultan Murad ever was.
This kind of an alliance (a formation of a UK-Turk trading bloc is a near certainty) would not just be a hard-power headache for mainland Europe, it would be a soft-power migraine too. The Muslim Brotherhood, which is extremely strong in Turkey, and which already has a fair network within Western Europe, would spread incredibly quick as a result among the European old guards like France, Germany, or Italy. Flexing under its neo-Ottoman vibes with the UK across one end, Turkey at the other, and an Islamic population within France, Germany, or Italy raring to cross the demographic threshold, there would be rapid coalescing of the fledgling MB-affiliated political parties and other socio-political groups that already function within these countries. For mainland Europe, the plan would be “influence”, not “invasion”. A trading bloc, access to Muslim Brotherhood’s finances through its global network and the finances of the City of London, you can then think of more mosques and a heavy push for an UK-Turkic brand of political Islam (however that might look).
How would Europe respond? I do not think Europe would have many options, not if they continue considering Russia as an “existential threat” – which unfortunately the European elites do and are trying their best to beat the average European into submitting to the idea. With a balkanised Ukraine and Russian territory gains, with a tanking EU economy, and with a restive Polish, Hungarian, or Romanian governments along central Europe, a pan-Islamic umbrella along the European west – one that not only unites the states but also provides the much needed military muscle – would be a welcome arrangement against the subject of their collective hatred: Russia.
Theoretically, it could also face the prospects of a split in NATO – with Islamised UK and Turkey across one end, and Germany-France-Poland-Italy across other, but that looks like a stretch given the way the governments of these states (except for Poland) vocally support illegal immigration of Arab and north African Muslims into their countries. The only exception would be if AfD in Germany and National Rally in France manage to form governments in the near future and manage to reverse some of the demographic threat that these countries face. Looks unlikely as of now, given the way EU is banning and jailing the conservative party leaders (Marin Le Pen or Calin Georgescu).
Regionally, Northern Ireland could witness an explosion in tensions if Britain’s Muslim majority leans anti-West, which it would, and Scotland might gun for complete independence to avoid getting dragged into the mess. But more than the Isles, it would be the Middle East that would make an interesting case. A UK-Turk alliance would immediately alienate KSA, UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, and Israel. And that might nudge Iran to take a good look at this new bloc for its regional compulsions, and Tehran might find an ally in this new duo. Once this comes into play, the USA would most certainly side with Israel and KSA, and in a weird manner of speaking, that might witness the confluence of interests of US-Israel and Russia once again (remember, this is 2040 we are talking about) after the Ukraine chapter.
The big picture? Europe’s balance tips. Turkey gains a proxy to flank the EU ― think trade leverage via London’s banks, think the renewed influx of Muslim Brotherhood’s influence in mainland Europe. When England’s military goes Islamist, say, in 2040, it is a nuclear wildcard, and a moment-of-truth for the US and Poland. Would the US turn to Middle East seeking a fresh, and more permanent alliance? Would Poland bite its tongue and seek to renew ties with Russia? Would a Turkey-UK axis rewrite NATO and the UN, with Muslim Brotherhood ideology seeping into policy? Would NATO or UN survive that long? Would Russia and China remain disaffected by this all, and continue business as usual? Most of these questions have no answer as of today. The only one constant is that perhaps in the eyes of the elites who control the affairs of the UK, the white English population have outlived their utility.
