Islamic terrorism has surged across Africa, transforming regions like the Sahel, East Africa and the Lake Chad Basin into global hotspots of jihadist violence. Groups such as Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab and Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimeen (JNIM) have exploited local socio-political conditions—poverty, weak governance, ethnic marginalisation, and political instability—to fuel insurgencies.
While these conditions exist across diverse African communities, jihadist violence has predominantly emerged within Muslim-majority or Muslim-minority regions, raising questions about why socio-political grievances in these areas often manifest as jihadist terrorism, whereas other groups facing similar challenges rarely adopt such extreme measures.
Socio-Political Conditions Fueling Jihadist Violence in Africa
Across Africa, socio-political conditions create fertile ground for insurgencies, but their translation into jihadist terrorism is shaped by specific dynamics. Many African states, particularly in the Sahel (e.g., Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger) and Somalia, suffer from chronic governance failures. Corrupt elites, ineffective institutions, and inability to provide basic services like education, healthcare, or security alienate populations.
For instance, in northern Nigeria, Boko Haram gained traction in the 2000s by exploiting widespread distrust in a government perceived as elitist and disconnected. The group’s founder, Mohammed Yusuf, capitalised on public frustration with corruption and unemployment, framing jihad as a solution to systemic injustice. Similarly, in Mali, the 2012 Tuareg rebellion and subsequent jihadist takeover of the north were enabled by a weak central government unable to assert control over vast, ungoverned territories.
Africa’s high youth population, coupled with rampant poverty, creates a ready pool of recruits for jihadist groups. In the Sahel, over 60% of the population is under 25, and unemployment rates often exceed 30%. Groups like JNIM and Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS) offer financial incentives, social status, or a sense of purpose to marginalised youth. In northern Nigeria, Boko Haram provides stipends and weapons, appealing to those excluded from economic opportunities. This economic despair, combined with a lack of education, amplifies vulnerability to radical ideologies promising empowerment through violence.
ALSO READ: ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN AFRICA
Ethnic and regional disparities exacerbate grievances, particularly in Muslim-majority areas. In Nigeria, the predominantly Muslim Hausa-Fulani north feels neglected compared to the Christian-majority south, fueling Boko Haram’s narrative of defending Muslim interests. In the Sahel, nomadic groups like the Fulani face exclusion from political and economic systems dominated by sedentary elites, driving some to join jihadist groups like JNIM, which frame their struggle as both ethnic and religious liberation. These localised grievances provide jihadists with a platform to rally support.
Political upheavals, such as military coups in Mali (2020, 2021) and Burkina Faso (2022), or Somalia’s state collapse in 1991, create power vacuums that jihadist groups exploit. The withdrawal of Western forces, such as France, from Mali in 2022, and the inconsistent presence of African Union or UN missions, have allowed groups like Al-Shabaab and ISGS to expand. These groups often present themselves as alternatives to failed states, offering governance —albeit brutal —in areas they control.
Why Jihad in Muslim Communities?
While socio-political conditions like poverty, weak governance, and marginalisation affect diverse communities across Africa, jihadist violence is predominantly associated with Muslim regions. This raises the question: why do these conditions lead to jihadist terrorism in Muslim communities but rarely in others, such as Christian or animist groups facing similar challenges? The answer lies in a combination of theological, historical, and organisational factors unique to certain Muslim contexts.
Islamic theology, particularly Salafi-jihadist interpretations, provides a framework that can transform socio-political grievances into violent action. Salafism, which emphasises a return to the practices of early Islam, combined with jihadism’s call for armed struggle, offers a potent ideological lens. Concepts like jihad (struggle, including armed struggle in some interpretations) and takfir (declaring Muslims as apostates for deviating from “true” Islam) are exploited by groups like Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab to justify violence against governments, civilians, and even other Muslims. For example, Boko Haram’s attacks on schools stem from its Salafi-inspired rejection of Western education as haram (forbidden). This theological framework, absent in other religious traditions, provides a ready narrative to channel grievances into militancy.
The role of Salafist Ideology in fuelling Jihad
The global spread of Salafi-jihadist ideologies, particularly after the Afghan-Soviet War (1979–1989), has disproportionately influenced Muslim communities. African fighters who joined the Afghan mujahideen returned with radical ideologies, establishing groups like Algeria’s Armed Islamic Group (GIA) and later AQIM. These global networks, reinforced by al-Qaeda and later ISIS, provide funding, training, and propaganda tailored to Muslim audiences. In contrast, other religious or ethnic groups lack comparable transnational ideological movements that advocate violence as a solution to local grievances.
Muslim communities in Africa often have pre-existing religious networks—mosques, madrasas, and charismatic clerics—that jihadist groups co-opt for recruitment and mobilisation. For instance, Al-Shabaab leverages Somalia’s clan-based structures and religious leaders to embed itself within communities, presenting jihad as a defence of both faith and clan identity. Other groups, such as Christians or animists, may face similar socio-political challenges but lack equivalent ideological frameworks or organisational structures that promote violence as a legitimate response.
In some regions, Muslim communities perceive themselves as uniquely targeted by secular or Christian-majority governments, amplifying grievances. In Nigeria, Boko Haram exploits tensions between the Muslim north and Christian south, framing state actions as anti-Islamic. Similarly, in Mali, jihadist groups portray French and UN interventions as a “crusade” against Muslims, resonating with communities already distrustful of external actors. This narrative of religious persecution, absent in other communities, fuels a sense of existential threat that jihadist groups exploit.
Why Not Other Communities in Africa?
Other religious or ethnic groups in Africa, such as Christians, animists, or secular movements, face similar socio-political challenges—poverty, marginalisation, and weak governance—but rarely turn to organised, ideologically driven violence on the scale of jihadist groups. Several factors explain this divergence. Christian or animist communities often lack theological or ideological doctrines that explicitly endorse violence as a solution to grievances.
For instance, Christian militias in places like the Central African Republic (e.g., Anti-Balaka) engage in violence, but these are typically reactive, localised, and lack the global ideological coherence of Salafi-jihadism. Secular movements, like separatist groups in Ethiopia’s Tigray, focus on political or ethnic goals rather than universalist ideologies.
Unlike jihadist groups, which benefit from al-Qaeda and ISIS’s global infrastructure, other communities rarely have access to comparable funding, training, or propaganda networks. This limits their ability to transform local grievances into sustained insurgencies. Many African Christian or animist traditions emphasise communal harmony or non-violent resistance, shaped by local customs or colonial-era missionary teachings.
In contrast, Salafi-jihadist ideologies, imported and adapted, prioritise militancy as a religious duty, overriding local norms of coexistence. Governments often co-opt or suppress non-Islamic insurgencies more effectively, as they lack the religious framing that complicates counterterrorism efforts against jihadist groups. For example, ethnic rebellions in Africa are often negotiated or crushed, whereas jihadist groups’ religious rhetoric makes them harder to integrate into political processes.
